1. Dlaczego uwa¿am, ¿e pisanie o grze jakiejkolwiek jest istotne. a) b) c) Œmiem Wierzyæ 30 sekund temu (edytowany) So. Who is the inspired author of Acts. Luke right? So if Paul is saying something else then the inspired author it does not mean the inspired author is wrong he might be right that Paul was saying what he was saying. Paul is not the inspired author here. Paul is probably speculating there and again giving the short version of the story. The Ezekiel and Exodus is easy. They are having a harder time in their flesh (the culture) so yeah imagine... 4 generation... your grandgranddad he did not say further why? Because its extremely rare to have grandgrandgranddad. Jesus have explained this very well - he who loves his dad,grandad,grandgranddad (pun intended) more than me (flesh over the spirit) is not worth of me - his spirit. Its all about the repentance - they are cursed of having a bad family too bad for them but they can turn away from them. Œmiem Wierzyæ Œmiem Wierzyæ 1 minutê temu (edytowany) In Matthew the stone is still there? Where? When did they went? You just imagine it. They went ok - but does it imply they came? When? Maybe after the earthquake. Does it specify that? No. You just read chronologicly and imagine they are there when the things happens. The text does not say what you imply. Matthew is not contradicting - the other Gospels gives additional information and Matthew did not felt the need to give additional info because the women told the disciple in the end. It is a normal in the stories to be like so. The short version and the long version. About the meat sacrificed into Idols Paul says not to do that because that makes your brother stumble. He does not say - oh you can stumble people around. No. You seem to say he make it seem like its ok. No he does not. He seem to say that for those that think they are just idols - that are freed its just a food but you can stumble others. Paul says he is saying this - as a Paul about the marriage stuff. Œmiem Wierzyæ Œmiem Wierzyæ 1 minutê temu (edytowany) Genesis 22 - the word is tested and not tempted only the kjv says it like that. The Hebrew word is Nissah. How can you be sure? 1 Samuel 17:39 is using that word and its about testing the wargear. That is not about temptation. If you are a KJV-only you have a problem but only if are a KJV cultist. And if you do not see the difference between testing and tempting you need to prayed for. I will leave the historical stuff as I cant answer on the spot. You really do not see that at the rising its still yet dark? Wow.... It can mean the same. Have you ever bean at the rising of the sun? Its still dark. "8 And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any man; for they were afraid." Mark 16:8 Did the women said this: "And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him. 7 But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you." So what is your problem? She did not believed the words of the angel because she was afraid. It doesnt mean they were muted or something. She was afraid and in disbelief until Jesus have apeared. It is only a problem if you do not know women lol - they say even if they not say lol - by screaming or mumbling or whatever lol. Do word "anything" means anything what was said? Yeah Œmiem Wierzyæ Œmiem Wierzyæ 35 minut temu "And the Lord caused his anger to burn forth again in Israel, and Satan stirred up David against them, saying, Go, number Israel and Juda" 2 Samuel 24 Thats in the Septuagint. Do not trust the masoretic text - there is something seriously wrong about it. Its like they did that on purpose to cause the elect of God to stumble. 2. Co by by³o gdyby gra by³a realistyczna 3. So many words - when you can sum them up - yeah people are dumb, cruel and proud. Yeah well.... 100% sure there are people like that...... But thats not the point.... we are talking about what does God mercy, God repentance and something not entering God's mind means. " Yes when something..... Anything happens..... It's EVIL to them that the Creator is brought up. Everything is s random accident.....clearly what you believe but likely won't admit........." No.... I do not believe that. What you are describing is a tomistic theology that some people might have. Not everyone is a tomist. Tomist basicly says that God works only by miracles. Yes is it very wrong doctrine and if you talk with such a people I can understand your emotions about it. I believe God works by different things. For example I believe that Ghengis Khan was speaking the truth when he said that he is the whip of God and many similiar things that God ordained that seems at the first glance that are harsh. God is the supreme ruler but that doesnt mean he does not allow for the autonomy. Why in the God's name would we to judge the angels if they wouldnt at least have tiny little bit of autonomy, and a man have more. "Trying to find the middle for the sake of winning a debate or something. " For the truth. Yeah you might say it is the middle. In the middle of radical weird satetements that you say some people make (maybe thats true but highly unlikely) and other radical weird statements. If I would have to pick between wrong and wrong I would not pick.
przemeksaw